Further Resources
The Uncomfortable Truth About Supervisory Experience: Skills They Don't Teach in Management 101
Related Reading:
The phone rang at 6:47 AM on a Wednesday. Not unusual in my line of work, but this call was different. Sarah, one of my former trainees who'd been promoted to supervisor six months earlier, was crying. "I don't think I can do this anymore," she said. "I've got the qualifications, I've done the courses, but nobody told me about the bit where your best worker starts showing up drunk."
That conversation happened three years ago, and it perfectly captures what's wrong with how we approach supervisory experience in Australia. We're obsessed with teaching people to manage processes, systems, and KPIs. But we're absolutely hopeless at preparing them for the messy, unpredictable reality of supervising actual human beings.
The Experience Gap Nobody Talks About
Here's what the textbooks won't tell you: supervisory experience isn't just about accumulating years in a role. It's about developing a specific type of emotional resilience that can only come from repeatedly having your assumptions about people challenged. And frankly, most of our supervisory training courses miss this entirely.
I've been running workplace training programs for seventeen years now, and I can spot a supervisor who's learned from real experience versus one who's just completed the required modules from fifty metres away. The experienced ones have this particular look in their eyes. Part wisdom, part wariness, and a healthy dose of "I've seen this before."
The inexperienced ones? They panic when someone doesn't follow the script.
Sarah's drunk employee situation is a perfect example. The training manual would tell you to follow the disciplinary procedure, document everything, and escalate to HR. All correct, but utterly useless when you're standing in a warehouse at 7 AM trying to decide whether to send someone home or risk them operating machinery.
What Real Supervisory Experience Actually Looks Like
Real supervisory experience teaches you things that sound obvious but are incredibly difficult to master:
Reading between the lines. When your usually punctual team member starts arriving fifteen minutes late every day, experienced supervisors know this isn't about time management. Something's changed in their life. Maybe it's childcare issues, maybe it's a relationship breakdown, maybe they're looking for another job. The inexperienced supervisor focuses on the lateness. The experienced one focuses on the person.
Knowing when to break your own rules. I once had a supervisor who let one of her team take an unauthorised three-hour lunch break because she knew the employee's mother was in hospital. She didn't ask for permission, didn't fill out forms, just made a human decision. That employee worked unpaid overtime for the next month without being asked.
Would HR approve? Probably not. Did it work? Absolutely.
Understanding that fairness isn't always equal. This one drives new supervisors mental. They want to treat everyone exactly the same because it feels fair. But experienced supervisors know that treating people fairly means giving them what they need to succeed, not giving everyone identical treatment.
Your detail-oriented team member needs different feedback than your big-picture thinker. Your introvert processes information differently than your extrovert. Your single parent has different constraints than your twenty-something graduate.
The Skills They Don't Put on Job Descriptions
After nearly two decades in this game, I've identified the skills that separate truly experienced supervisors from those just going through the motions:
Comfortable with ambiguity. New supervisors want clear answers: "What do I do if...?" Experienced supervisors understand that most situations exist in grey areas. They're comfortable making decisions with incomplete information and adjusting course as needed.
Selective deafness. Sounds terrible, doesn't it? But experienced supervisors know when to ignore complaints, when to let team members vent without trying to fix everything, and when to pretend they didn't hear that slightly inappropriate joke that everyone found funny.
Strategic patience. This isn't about being passive. It's about understanding when to act immediately and when to let situations develop. Sometimes the problem solves itself. Sometimes it gets worse and requires intervention. Experience teaches you to tell the difference.
The Brisbane Test
I call it the Brisbane test because it happened to me during a particularly challenging project in Brisbane about eight years ago. I was working with a supervisor who looked perfect on paper. MBA, five years management experience, excellent performance reviews. But when faced with a team member who was clearly struggling with mental health issues, he froze.
Not because he didn't care. Not because he lacked compassion. But because his experience had been in environments where problems had clear solutions and established procedures. He'd never learned to navigate the space between "official company policy" and "what this human being actually needs right now."
That's when I realised we're measuring supervisory experience all wrong. We count years in role, number of direct reports, budget responsibility. But we don't measure adaptability, emotional intelligence, or crisis management capability.
What Makes Experience Stick
Here's something I learned the hard way: not all supervisory experience is equal. You can supervise people for ten years and learn nothing if you're not paying attention. I've met supervisors with decades of experience who keep making the same mistakes because they never reflected on what went wrong.
The supervisors who develop real experience share common habits:
They debrief failures honestly. When something goes sideways, they don't just fix it and move on. They figure out what they missed, what they'd do differently, and what early warning signs they should watch for next time.
They actively seek feedback from their teams. Not through formal surveys, but through real conversations. They ask questions like "What's one thing I could do differently that would make your job easier?" and actually listen to the answers.
They study their own reactions. They notice when they feel frustrated, defensive, or overwhelmed, and they get curious about what triggers those responses.
The Melbourne Revelation
Two years ago, I was delivering a leadership skills program in Melbourne when one of the participants challenged something I'd said about delegation. She was absolutely right, and I was absolutely wrong. It was embarrassing, but it reminded me why supervisory experience is so valuable.
Experience teaches you that being wrong isn't the end of the world. It's information. New supervisors often think they need to have all the answers. Experienced supervisors know that admitting ignorance and asking good questions is often more valuable than pretending to know something you don't.
The Real Test of Supervisory Experience
You want to know if someone has genuine supervisory experience? Watch how they handle the unexpected. Not the big, dramatic crises that make good training scenarios, but the weird, mundane problems that don't fit any category.
Like the time one of my supervisors had to deal with a team member who kept bringing their emotional support peacock to work. (Yes, really. And no, it wasn't actually certified.) Or when another supervisor discovered that two team members had been running a small business selling homemade soap during lunch breaks.
These aren't situations you can prepare for with policy manuals or training modules. They require judgement, creativity, and the confidence that comes from having navigated similar uncharted territory before.
Building Real Experience (Not Just Time in Role)
If you're serious about developing supervisory experience rather than just accumulating supervisory tenure, here are the approaches that actually work:
Volunteer for the difficult assignments. Don't just manage the high-performing teams. Ask for the struggling departments, the problem projects, the situations where previous supervisors have failed. That's where you learn.
Cross-train with other supervisors. Spend time with supervisors in different departments, different industries, different contexts. The supervisor managing a retail team faces different challenges than the one running a manufacturing shift, but the underlying human dynamics are surprisingly similar.
Keep a decision journal. Write down the tough calls you make and review them six months later. What worked? What didn't? What would you do differently? This simple practice accelerates experience development more than anything else I've tried.
The Perth Perspective
Last month I was in Perth working with a mining company, and their site supervisor told me something that's stuck with me. He said, "The difference between a new supervisor and an experienced one isn't that the experienced one makes better decisions. It's that they're less surprised when their first decision doesn't work."
That's supervisory experience in a nutshell. It's not about getting everything right the first time. It's about developing the confidence and adaptability to handle whatever comes next.
The supervisors who thrive aren't the ones who follow the manual perfectly. They're the ones who understand when to follow the manual, when to adapt it, and when to throw it out the window entirely. And you can only learn that through experience. Real, messy, imperfect experience.
Because at the end of the day, supervision isn't about managing systems or processes. It's about working with people. And people, thank goodness, refuse to behave like systems or processes.
Which brings me back to Sarah. She stayed in the role, by the way. Figured out how to handle the drunk employee situation, dealt with three more crises that weren't in any manual, and now she's one of the most effective supervisors in her organisation. Not because she learned more theory, but because she learned to trust her experience.